Novel Piperazine Derivatives as Potent Antihistamine, Anti-Inflammatory, and Anticancer Agents, their Synthesis and Characterization.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, a series of novel piperazine derivatives were synthesised with high-to-good yields, and their structural analogies were confirmed using FTIR, 1H-NMR, and LC-MS techniques. METHOD: The synthesised compounds were evaluated for antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Among the four synthesised piperazine derivatives, compound PD-2 exhibited relatively good antioxidant activity, with an IC50 value of 2.396 µg/mL, while the other three derivatives showed moderate to low antioxidant activity. Furthermore, compound PD-2 displayed antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a gram-negative bacterium, and Candida albicans, a fungus. However, all four compounds showed strong resistance against grampositive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus. RESULT: Additionally, compound PD-1 exhibited significant antihistamine activity, eliciting an 18.22% reduction in histamine levels. Both PD-1 and PD-2 demonstrated noteworthy anti-inflammatory activity in a dosedependent manner (5-10µM), leading to the inhibition of nitrite production up to 39.42% and 33.7% at higher concentrations (10 µM) and inhibition of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) generation up to 56.97% and 44.73% at 10 µM, respectively. Additionally, both novel molecules PD-1 and PD-2 effectively restrained the growth of HepG2 cells in a manner that is dependent on the dosage up to 55.44% and 90.45% at the highest concentrations (100 µg/mL), respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings substantiate the rationale for further investigation into the novel series of persuasive piperazine analogues as potential agents with anti-inflammatory, antihistamine and anticancer properties.

Green Synthesis of a Novel Phytoalexin Derivative: In Silico Profiling, Apoptotic Induction, and Antiproliferative Activity against MCF-7 cells - From Vineyards to Potent Anticancer Drug Molecule.

BACKGROUND: Resveratrol's structural similarity to commercialized anti-breast cancer medications such as Tamoxifen underlines its potential as a promising option for developing successful anti-breast cancer drugs. However, the pharmacokinetic issues associated with resveratrol, such as its low bioavailability, have piqued the attention of researchers in developing novel derivatives. METHODS: A novel phytoalexin derivative, RsvD1, was successfully synthesized using resveratrol extracted from green grape peels as a precursor to investigate its anti-breast cancer efficacy on Estrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative breast cancer cells. RESULTS: The comparative analysis revealed that RsvD1 exhibited remarkable radical scavenging ability (IC50 = 2.21 µg/mL), surpassing the control, Trolox (IC50 = 6.3 µg/mL). Furthermore, RsvD1 demonstrated enhanced and selective antiproliferative activity against ER-positive MCF-7 cells (IC50 = 20.09 µg/mL) compared to resveratrol, the parent molecule (IC50 = 30.90 µg/mL). Further investigations unveiled that RsvD1 induced apoptosis and DNA damage in MCF-7 cells, leading to cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase after 24 hours of incubation. RTqPCR gene expression analysis indicated that RsvD1 down-regulated the CAXII (ER-dependent) genes. In silico predictions demonstrated that RsvD1 possesses promising potential as a drug candidate due to its drug-like characteristics and favourable ADMET profile. Moreover, molecular docking studies provided insights into the theoretical binding mode between RsvD1 and ERα protein. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the therapeutic potential of the synthesized resveratrol derivative, RsvD1, positioning it as a promising scaffold for developing novel analogues with improved therapeutic properties and selectivity, specifically targeting ER+ breast cancer cells. Moreover, the compound's non-cytotoxic yet antiproliferative properties, coupled with its capability to induce programmed cell death and cell cycle arrest, enhance its potential as a highly effective drug candidate. As a result, this paves a promising path for the development of innovative and selective inhibitors targeting ER+ breast cancer with enhanced efficacy.

Human J-Domain Protein DnaJB6 Protects Yeast from [PSI+] Prion Toxicity.

Human J-domain protein (JDP) DnaJB6 has a broad and potent activity that prevents formation of amyloid by polypeptides such as polyglutamine, A-beta, and alpha-synuclein, related to Huntington's, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's diseases, respectively. In yeast, amyloid-based [PSI+] prions, which rely on the related JDP Sis1 for replication, have a latent toxicity that is exposed by reducing Sis1 function. Anti-amyloid activity of DnaJB6 is very effective against weak [PSI+] prions and the Sup35 amyloid that composes them, but ineffective against strong [PSI+] prions composed of structurally different amyloid of the same Sup35. This difference reveals limitations of DnaJB6 that have implications regarding its therapeutic use for amyloid disease. Here, we find that when Sis1 function is reduced, DnaJB6 represses toxicity of strong [PSI+] prions and inhibits their propagation. Both Sis1 and DnaJB6, which are regulators of protein chaperone Hsp70, counteract the toxicity by reducing excessive incorporation of the essential Sup35 into prion aggregates. However, while Sis1 apparently requires interaction with Hsp70 to detoxify [PSI+], DnaJB6 counteracts prion toxicity by a different, Hsp70-independent mechanism.

J Proteins Counteract Amyloid Propagation and Toxicity in Yeast.

The accumulation of misfolded proteins as amyloids is associated with pathology in dozens of debilitating human disorders, including diabetes, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's diseases. Expressing human amyloid-forming proteins in yeast is toxic, and yeast prions that propagate as infectious amyloid forms of cellular proteins are also harmful. The yeast system, which has been useful for studying amyloids and their toxic effects, has provided much insight into how amyloids affect cells and how cells respond to them. Given that an amyloid is a protein folding problem, it is unsurprising that the factors found to counteract the propagation or toxicity of amyloids in yeast involve protein quality control. Here, we discuss such factors with an emphasis on J-domain proteins (JDPs), which are the most highly abundant and diverse regulators of Hsp70 chaperones. The anti-amyloid effects of JDPs can be direct or require interaction with Hsp70.

Yeast J-protein Sis1 prevents prion toxicity by moderating depletion of prion protein.

[PSI+] is a prion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sup35, an essential ribosome release factor. In [PSI+] cells, most Sup35 is sequestered into insoluble amyloid aggregates. Despite this depletion, [PSI+] prions typically affect viability only modestly, so [PSI+] must balance sequestering Sup35 into prions with keeping enough Sup35 functional for normal growth. Sis1 is an essential J-protein regulator of Hsp70 required for the propagation of amyloid-based yeast prions. C-terminally truncated Sis1 (Sis1JGF) supports cell growth in place of wild-type Sis1. Sis1JGF also supports [PSI+] propagation, yet [PSI+] is highly toxic to cells expressing only Sis1JGF. We searched extensively for factors that mitigate the toxicity and identified only Sis1, suggesting Sis1 is uniquely needed to protect from [PSI+] toxicity. We find the C-terminal substrate-binding domain of Sis1 has a critical and transferable activity needed for the protection. In [PSI+] cells that express Sis1JGF in place of Sis1, Sup35 was less soluble and formed visibly larger prion aggregates. Exogenous expression of a truncated Sup35 that cannot incorporate into prions relieved [PSI+] toxicity. Together our data suggest that Sis1 has separable roles in propagating Sup35 prions and in moderating Sup35 aggregation that are crucial to the balance needed for the propagation of what otherwise would be lethal [PSI+] prions.

Human DnaJB6 Antiamyloid Chaperone Protects Yeast from Polyglutamine Toxicity Separately from Spatial Segregation of Aggregates.

Polyglutamine (polyQ) aggregates are associated with pathology in protein-folding diseases and with toxicity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Protection from polyQ toxicity in yeast by human DnaJB6 coincides with sequestration of aggregates. Gathering of misfolded proteins into deposition sites by protein quality control (PQC) factors has led to the view that PQC processes protect cells by spatially segregating toxic aggregates. Whether DnaJB6 depends on this machinery to sequester polyQ aggregates, if this sequestration is needed for DnaJB6 to protect cells, and the identity of the deposition site are unknown. Here, we found DnaJB6-driven deposits share characteristics with perivacuolar insoluble protein deposition sites (IPODs). Binding of DnaJB6 to aggregates was necessary, but not enough, for detoxification. Focal formation required a DnaJB6-Hsp70 interaction and actin, polyQ could be detoxified without sequestration, and segregation of aggregates alone was not protective. Our findings suggest DnaJB6 binds to smaller polyQ aggregates to block their toxicity. Assembly and segregation of detoxified aggregates are driven by an Hsp70- and actin-dependent process. Our findings show sequestration of aggregates is not the primary mechanism by which DnaJB6 suppresses toxicity and raise questions regarding how and when misfolded proteins are detoxified during spatial segregation.